{"id":18355,"date":"2026-08-13T10:19:34","date_gmt":"2026-08-13T10:19:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/financialmarkets.academy\/academy\/?p=18355"},"modified":"2026-08-13T10:25:19","modified_gmt":"2026-08-13T10:25:19","slug":"risk-to-reward-ratio-how-professional-traders-evaluate-a-trade-before-entering","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/financialmarkets.academy\/academy\/risk-to-reward-ratio-how-professional-traders-evaluate-a-trade-before-entering\/","title":{"rendered":"Risk-to-Reward Ratio: How Professional Traders Evaluate a Trade Before Entering"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t“`html\n
\n\n \n
\n
\n Module 1 \u00b7 Foundations & Risk \u00b7 Lesson 4\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Risk-to-Reward Ratio: How Professional Traders Evaluate a Trade Before Entering\n <\/h1>\n\n

\n Learn how to compare potential loss with potential profit, calculate risk-to-reward ratios, avoid weak setups and judge whether a trade is worth taking before you ever enter.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n Risk-to-Reward<\/span>\n Trade Planning<\/span>\n Expected Value<\/span>\n Capital Protection<\/span>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n

\n A trade can look attractive and still be a terrible trade.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n Maybe the direction makes sense. Maybe the entry looks clean. Maybe price is sitting at a strong technical level.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n But if you have to risk $500 for the realistic possibility of making $100, the setup may not deserve your capital.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n A professional trader does not only ask, \u201cCan this trade win?\u201d They also ask, \u201cIs the potential reward worth the risk required to take it?\u201d\n <\/div>\n\n

\n That is where the risk-to-reward ratio becomes one of the most useful tools in trade planning.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n
Lesson Objectives<\/div>\n\n

What You\u2019ll Learn<\/h2>\n\n
\n
\u2713 What risk-to-reward means<\/div>\n
\u2713 How to calculate R:R<\/div>\n
\u2713 Why win rate is not everything<\/div>\n
\u2713 What breakeven win rate means<\/div>\n
\u2713 Why forcing 1:2 can be a mistake<\/div>\n
\u2713 How to evaluate a setup before entering<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n What Is Risk-to-Reward Ratio?\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Risk-to-reward ratio compares how much you are prepared to lose on a trade with how much you could potentially make if the trade reaches its target.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n It is usually written like this:\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n Risk-to-Reward Ratio\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 1 : 2\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Risk 1 unit to potentially make 2 units.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n The \u201cunit\u201d can be dollars, pips, points, percentages or another consistent measurement.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Simple Risk-to-Reward Examples\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n
\n
1 : 0.5<\/div>\n
Risk: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n
Potential Reward: $50<\/strong><\/div>\n
Weak Reward<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
1 : 1<\/div>\n
Risk: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n
Potential Reward: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n
Equal Risk & Reward<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
1 : 2<\/div>\n
Risk: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n
Potential Reward: $200<\/strong><\/div>\n
2\u00d7 Reward<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
1 : 3<\/div>\n
Risk: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n
Potential Reward: $300<\/strong><\/div>\n
3\u00d7 Reward<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n How to Calculate Risk-to-Reward\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n You need three basic pieces of information:\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
Entry<\/div>\n Where You Enter<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Stop Loss<\/div>\n Where You Are Wrong<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Target<\/div>\n Where You Exit<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Example<\/div>\n\n
\n
\n
Entry<\/div>\n 1.1500<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Stop<\/div>\n 1.1480<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Target<\/div>\n 1.1540<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Entry to stop:\n <\/p>\n\n

\n 20 Pips Risk\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Entry to target:\n <\/p>\n\n

\n 40 Pips Reward\n <\/div>\n\n
\n \n 20 pips risk vs. 40 pips reward = approximately 1:2.\n <\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n Pips vs. Dollars: The Ratio Stays the Same\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Suppose your position size means each pip is worth $5.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Measurement<\/th>\n Risk<\/th>\n Reward<\/th>\n Ratio<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <\/thead>\n\n
Pips<\/strong><\/td>\n 20<\/td>\n 40<\/td>\n 1:2<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
Dollars<\/strong><\/td>\n $100<\/td>\n $200<\/td>\n 1:2<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n The unit changes. The relationship does not.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Why Risk-to-Reward Matters\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Risk-to-reward helps traders evaluate the quality of the opportunity before money is committed.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n It answers an important question:\n <\/p>\n\n

\n Is the potential upside large enough to justify the downside?\n <\/div>\n\n

\n This does not guarantee that the trade will win. It simply helps ensure that the potential payoff makes sense relative to what you are putting at risk.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Win Rate Is Only Half the Story\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Beginners often obsess over win rate.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n They want a strategy that wins 80%, 90% or even 100% of the time.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n But win rate without risk-to-reward tells you very little.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
Trader A<\/div>\n\n
80% Win Rate<\/div>\n\n
Average Win: $50<\/strong><\/div>\n
Average Loss: $300<\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Trader B<\/div>\n\n
45% Win Rate<\/div>\n\n
Average Win: $250<\/strong><\/div>\n
Average Loss: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Trader A wins much more frequently, but one loss can erase several wins. Trader B wins less often, but each winner can cover multiple losses.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n The Bigger Concept: Trading Expectancy\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Risk-to-reward and win rate work together to create what traders often call expectancy<\/strong>.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n Expectancy asks whether a strategy is likely to make or lose money over a large sample of trades.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
Simplified Expectancy<\/div>\n\n
\n (Win Rate \u00d7 Average Win) \u2212 (Loss Rate \u00d7 Average Loss)\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n Example Strategy\n <\/h3>\n\n
\n
Win rate: 50%<\/strong><\/div>\n
Average winner: $200<\/strong><\/div>\n
Average loser: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Over 10 trades:\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
5 Winners<\/div>\n
+$1,000<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
5 Losers<\/div>\n
-$500<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Net<\/div>\n
+$500<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n \n A strategy does not need to win most of the time if its average winners are sufficiently larger than its average losses.\n <\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n Breakeven Win Rate\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Every risk-to-reward structure has an approximate win rate required to break even before costs.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Risk-to-Reward<\/th>\n Approx. Breakeven Win Rate<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <\/thead>\n\n
1 : 0.5<\/strong><\/td>\n About 66.7%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
1 : 1<\/strong><\/td>\n 50%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
1 : 2<\/strong><\/td>\n About 33.3%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
1 : 3<\/strong><\/td>\n 25%<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n In real trading, spreads, commissions, slippage and execution reduce results, so practical breakeven rates may be slightly higher.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Does Every Trade Need a 1:2 Risk-to-Reward Ratio?\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n No.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n One of the most common mistakes in trading education is turning 1:2 into a rigid rule regardless of market structure.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n A trade should not have an unrealistic target simply because you want the calculator to display 1:2.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n Bad Trade Planning\n <\/div>\n\n
\n \u201cMy stop is 30 pips, so my target must automatically be 60 pips.\u201d\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n What if major resistance is only 25 pips above your entry?\n <\/p>\n\n

\n The chart does not care about your preferred ratio.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Let Market Structure Define the Opportunity\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Your stop and target should be based on meaningful market levels.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n 1.<\/strong> Identify the trade setup.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 2.<\/strong> Determine where the setup becomes invalid.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 3.<\/strong> Identify the realistic target based on structure.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 4.<\/strong> Calculate the resulting risk-to-reward ratio.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 5.<\/strong> Decide whether the opportunity is worth taking.\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n \n Calculate the ratio from the market setup. Do not force the market setup to fit your preferred ratio.\n <\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n A Good Setup Can Still Have Poor Risk-to-Reward\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Suppose you identify a strong bullish setup.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n The market structure looks good. Buyers are in control. Your confirmation appears.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n But you entered late.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
Stop required: 30 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
Realistic target remaining: 15 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
Risk-to-Reward = 1:0.5<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n The original market idea may have been excellent. Your late entry turned it into a poor opportunity.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Entry Quality Changes Risk-to-Reward\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Two traders can trade the same market direction and get very different results simply because of entry location.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
Trader A<\/div>\n

Patient Entry<\/h3>\n
Risk: 20 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
Target: 50 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
1 : 2.5<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Trader B<\/div>\n

Chases Price<\/h3>\n
Risk: 35 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
Target: 25 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
1 : 0.71<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Same market. Same overall direction. Completely different trade quality.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Higher Risk-to-Reward Is Not Automatically Better\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n A 1:5 trade sounds better than a 1:2 trade.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n But only if the target is realistic.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n A trader who constantly targets huge moves may achieve impressive theoretical ratios while rarely reaching the target.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n Professional View\n <\/div>\n\n
\n A realistic 1:2 opportunity can be more valuable than an unrealistic 1:10 fantasy target.\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n What About Partial Profits?\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Some traders do not close the entire position at one target.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n They may take partial profit at one level and leave the remainder open for a larger move.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n

Example<\/h3>\n\n
50% of position closed at: 1R<\/strong><\/div>\n
Remaining 50% targeted at: 3R<\/strong><\/div>\n
Final result depends on how both portions are managed.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Once you begin scaling out, the final realized risk-to-reward calculation becomes more complex than a simple one-target trade.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Understanding \u201cR\u201d Multiples\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Traders often describe performance using R<\/strong>.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n One R represents the amount initially risked.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
-1R<\/div>\n
Full planned loss<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
+1R<\/div>\n
Profit equal to risk<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
+2R<\/div>\n
Twice the risk<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
+3R<\/div>\n
Three times the risk<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Using R makes it easier to compare performance across different account sizes and position sizes.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Example: Tracking Trades in R\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Trade<\/th>\n Result<\/th>\n R Result<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <\/thead>\n\n
Trade 1<\/td>\n Loss<\/td>\n -1R<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
Trade 2<\/td>\n Win<\/td>\n +2R<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
Trade 3<\/td>\n Loss<\/td>\n -1R<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
Trade 4<\/td>\n Win<\/td>\n +3R<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n\n
Total<\/strong><\/td>\n 2 Wins \/ 2 Losses<\/td>\n +3R<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n The trader only won 50% of the trades and still finished significantly positive.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Risk-to-Reward Must Be Combined With Probability\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n A ratio by itself does not tell you whether a trade is good.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n You also need to consider the probability of reaching the target.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
Trade A<\/div>\n
1 : 2<\/div>\n
Realistic structural target<\/div>\n
Clear confirmation<\/div>\n
Good market conditions<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Trade B<\/div>\n
1 : 6<\/div>\n
Target far beyond structure<\/div>\n
Weak confirmation<\/div>\n
Poor market conditions<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n The higher number does not automatically make Trade B superior.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n When Should You Skip a Trade?\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Sometimes the best decision is not to trade.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n

Possible Reasons to Pass<\/h3>\n\n
\n
\u2022 Stop is unusually wide<\/div>\n
\u2022 Entry is too late<\/div>\n
\u2022 Target is too close<\/div>\n
\u2022 Major resistance blocks the trade<\/div>\n
\u2022 Major support blocks the trade<\/div>\n
\u2022 The ratio is poor<\/div>\n
\u2022 Market conditions are unclear<\/div>\n
\u2022 News risk changes the setup<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n \n A missed trade costs nothing.\n <\/strong>\n\n \n A bad trade taken because you were impatient can cost capital and discipline.\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n Complete Trade Planning Example\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Imagine a trader is evaluating a EUR\/USD buy setup.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
\n
Entry<\/div>\n 1.0800<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Stop<\/div>\n 1.0775<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Target<\/div>\n 1.0850<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Account Risk<\/div>\n $100<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Stop distance: 25 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
Target distance: 50 pips<\/strong><\/div>\n
Maximum dollar risk: $100<\/strong><\/div>\n
Potential dollar reward: $200<\/strong><\/div>\n
Risk-to-Reward = 1:2<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n The trader now understands the complete trade before entering \u2014 direction, invalidation, target, financial risk and potential reward.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n Common Risk-to-Reward Mistakes\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n
\n Forcing Every Trade to 1:2<\/strong>
\n The market structure should determine the target, not an arbitrary ratio.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Ignoring Win Rate<\/strong>
\n Risk-to-reward and probability must be evaluated together.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Chasing Huge Ratios<\/strong>
\n A 1:10 target means nothing if price has almost no realistic chance of reaching it.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Entering Too Late<\/strong>
\n Poor entry location can destroy an otherwise attractive risk-to-reward profile.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Moving the Stop After Entry<\/strong>
\n Increasing stop distance changes your original risk and can destroy the planned ratio.\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Taking Profit Emotionally<\/strong>
\n Closing every winner early can dramatically reduce your actual average reward.\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n The Professional Pre-Trade Framework\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n
1.<\/strong> What is the market context?<\/div>\n
2.<\/strong> Why does the setup make sense?<\/div>\n
3.<\/strong> Where is the logical entry?<\/div>\n
4.<\/strong> Where does the idea become invalid?<\/div>\n
5.<\/strong> Where is the realistic target?<\/div>\n
6.<\/strong> What is the resulting risk-to-reward?<\/div>\n
7.<\/strong> Does the setup fit the strategy’s historical edge?<\/div>\n
8.<\/strong> Is this trade worth risking capital on?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n
\n Trade With Structure\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Learn to Evaluate the Trade Before You Enter It\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n Financial Markets Academy offers live 1-on-1 mentorship for traders who want to learn how to identify quality setups, define risk, set realistic targets and build a trading process that is based on structure instead of emotion.\n <\/p>\n\n \n Reserve Your Seat \u2192\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n Risk-to-Reward Checklist\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n
\u2713 Do I know my exact entry?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Is my stop based on market invalidation?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Is my target based on realistic market structure?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Have I calculated the actual R:R?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Am I forcing a target just to reach a preferred ratio?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Is my entry too late?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Does the potential reward justify the risk?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Does this setup fit my strategy’s typical win rate?<\/div>\n
\u2713 Am I willing to skip this trade if the numbers do not make sense?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n Frequently Asked Questions\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n
\n

What is a good risk-to-reward ratio in trading?<\/h3>\n

\n There is no single ratio that is best for every strategy. A good ratio must be realistic for the setup and work together with the strategy’s win rate and overall expectancy.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n

What does 1:2 risk-to-reward mean?<\/h3>\n

\n A 1:2 ratio means you are risking one unit of loss for the possibility of gaining two units. For example, risking $100 to potentially make $200.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n

Can a trader be profitable with a 40% win rate?<\/h3>\n

\n Yes. If average winning trades are sufficiently larger than average losing trades, a strategy can potentially be profitable even with a win rate below 50%.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n

Is 1:3 better than 1:2?<\/h3>\n

\n Not automatically. The higher target must still be realistic. A lower ratio with a stronger probability of success may be superior to an unrealistic high-R setup.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n

Should I always target two times my stop loss?<\/h3>\n

\n No. Targets should reflect market structure, volatility and the strategy being traded rather than an arbitrary fixed multiple.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n

\n

What is an R multiple?<\/h3>\n

\n R represents your initial risk. A full planned loss is -1R, while a winner twice the amount risked is +2R.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n
\n Test Yourself\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Lesson 4 Knowledge Quiz\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n 1. What does a 1:2 risk-to-reward ratio mean?<\/strong>\n
\n A. Risk $2 to make $1
\n B. Risk 1 unit to potentially make 2 units
\n C. Win two trades for every loss
\n D. Risk 2% per trade\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 2. Does every trade need to have a 1:2 ratio?<\/strong>\n
\n A. Yes
\n B. No
\n C. Only Forex trades
\n D. Only gold trades\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 3. What should normally determine your target?<\/strong>\n
\n A. Your desired daily profit
\n B. Market structure and the trading setup
\n C. Maximum leverage
\n D. Another trader’s target\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 4. Can a strategy with a 40% win rate be profitable?<\/strong>\n
\n A. Never
\n B. Yes, if average winners outweigh average losses sufficiently
\n C. Only on demo
\n D. Only with no stop loss\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n 5. What does +3R mean?<\/strong>\n
\n A. Profit equal to three times the original risk
\n B. Three losing trades
\n C. Risking 3%
\n D. Three open positions\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Answer Key:<\/strong> 1. B \u00b7 2. B \u00b7 3. B \u00b7 4. B \u00b7 5. A\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n Key Takeaways\n <\/h2>\n\n
\n
\u2713 Risk-to-reward compares potential loss with potential profit.<\/div>\n
\u2713 A 1:2 setup risks one unit to potentially make two.<\/div>\n
\u2713 Win rate and R:R must be analyzed together.<\/div>\n
\u2713 Higher R:R is not automatically better.<\/div>\n
\u2713 Market structure should determine realistic targets.<\/div>\n
\u2713 Entry quality can dramatically change the ratio.<\/div>\n
\u2713 R multiples make strategy performance easier to compare.<\/div>\n
\u2713 A trader can be profitable while losing more trades than they win.<\/div>\n
\u2713 A good-looking setup can still be a bad trade if the reward is too small.<\/div>\n
\u2713 Sometimes the professional decision is simply to pass.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n
\n Coming Next\n <\/div>\n\n

\n Lesson 5: Building Your First Trading Plan\n <\/h2>\n\n

\n You now understand market basics, risk management, position sizing and risk-to-reward. The final lesson in Module 1 brings those pieces together into a written trading plan with rules for entries, risk, sessions, losses and execution.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n Build Rules Before You Risk Real Money \u2192\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n Financial Markets Academy provides educational information only. Nothing in this lesson constitutes financial or investment advice or a guarantee of trading performance. Trading leveraged financial markets involves substantial risk and may not be suitable for everyone.\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n“`\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“`html Module 1 \u00b7 Foundations & Risk \u00b7 Lesson 4 Risk-to-Reward Ratio: How Professional Traders Evaluate a Trade Before Entering Learn how…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18357,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-module-1"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t