{"id":28566,"date":"2026-08-16T13:34:30","date_gmt":"2026-08-16T13:34:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/financialmarkets.academy\/academy\/?p=28566"},"modified":"2026-08-16T13:36:22","modified_gmt":"2026-08-16T13:36:22","slug":"trading-strategy-statistics-win-rate-expectancy-profit-factor-drawdown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/financialmarkets.academy\/academy\/2026\/08\/16\/trading-strategy-statistics-win-rate-expectancy-profit-factor-drawdown\/","title":{"rendered":"Trading Strategy Statistics: Win Rate, Expectancy, Profit Factor & Drawdown"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n Module 7 \u00b7 Building & Testing a Complete Trading Strategy \u00b7 Lesson 3<\/p>\n

\n Trading Strategy Statistics: Win Rate, Expectancy, Profit Factor & Drawdown
\n <\/h1>\n

\n Learn how to measure the performance of a trading strategy using win rate, average winner, average loser, expectancy, profit factor, drawdown, losing streaks and other statistics that reveal whether a strategy actually has an edge.\n <\/p>\n

Win Rate
\n Expectancy
\n Profit Factor
\n Drawdown
\n <\/p>\n

\n A 75% win rate sounds impressive.\n <\/p>\n

\n But what if the average winner makes 0.5R and the average loser loses 3R?\n <\/p>\n

\n A 40% win rate sounds weak.\n <\/p>\n

\n But what if the average winner makes 3R while the average loser loses only 1R?\n <\/p>\n

No single statistic tells you whether a trading strategy is good. The numbers must be interpreted together.<\/p>\n

\n In this lesson, we take the backtest data from Lesson 2 and turn it into meaningful performance statistics.\n <\/p>\n


\n Lesson Objectives<\/p>\n

\n What You\u2019ll Learn
\n <\/h2>\n

\u2713 How to calculate win rate
\n \u2713 Why win rate alone can mislead
\n \u2713 How expectancy measures edge
\n \u2713 What profit factor reveals
\n \u2713 How to analyze drawdown
\n \u2713 How to compare strategy quality objectively
\n <\/p>\n

\n Why Trading Statistics Matter
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Traders naturally remember dramatic wins and painful losses.\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistics prevent those memorable trades from controlling your judgment.\n <\/p>\n

Individual Trade \u2192 Emotion
\n Large Sample \u2192 Evidence<\/p>\n

\n A strategy should be evaluated across a meaningful sample rather than by the outcome of the last few trades.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n The Core Strategy Statistics
\n <\/h2>\n

Win Rate<\/strong>
\n How often trades win.
\n Average Winner<\/strong>
\n Average profit on winning trades.
\n Average Loser<\/strong>
\n Average loss on losing trades.
\n Expectancy<\/strong>
\n Expected average result per trade.
\n Profit Factor<\/strong>
\n Gross profit versus gross loss.
\n Drawdown<\/strong>
\n Decline from peak equity.
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #1: Win Rate
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Win rate measures the percentage of trades that finish as winners.\n <\/p>\n

Win Rate = Winning Trades \u00f7 Total Trades \u00d7 100
\n Winning trades: 54<\/strong>
\n Total trades: 100<\/strong>
\n Win Rate = 54%
\n <\/p>\n

\n The Win-Rate Trap
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Traders often assume a higher win rate automatically means a better strategy.\n <\/p>\n

\n It does not.\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Strategy<\/th>\nWin Rate<\/th>\nAvg Winner<\/th>\nAvg Loser<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Strategy A<\/strong><\/td>\n75%<\/td>\n+0.5R<\/td>\n-2R<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strategy B<\/strong><\/td>\n40%<\/td>\n+3R<\/td>\n-1R<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n


\n Win rate tells you how often you win. It does not tell you how much you win when you are right or how much you lose when you are wrong.
\n <\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Loss Rate
\n <\/h2>\n

\n If you exclude breakeven trades, loss rate can often be calculated as:\n <\/p>\n

Loss Rate = 100% \u2212 Win Rate
\n Win rate = 54%
\n Loss rate = 46%<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #2: Average Winner
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Average winner measures the average size of all profitable trades.\n <\/p>\n

Average Winner = Total R From Winning Trades \u00f7 Number of Winners
\n Total winning R: 108R<\/strong>
\n Winning trades: 54<\/strong><\/p>\n

Average winner = +2R<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #3: Average Loser
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Average loser measures the average size of losing trades.\n <\/p>\n

Total losing R: -46R<\/strong>
\n Losing trades: 46<\/strong><\/p>\n

Average loser = -1R<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #4: Payoff Ratio
\n <\/h2>\n

\n The payoff ratio compares the average winning trade with the average losing trade.\n <\/p>\n

Payoff Ratio = Average Winner \u00f7 Average Loser
\n Average winner = 2R
\n Average loser = 1R<\/p>\n

Payoff ratio = 2.0<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #5: Expectancy
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Expectancy is one of the most important statistics in strategy analysis.\n <\/p>\n

\n It estimates the average amount a strategy earns or loses per trade over a large sample.\n <\/p>\n

Expectancy = (Win Rate \u00d7 Average Win) \u2212 (Loss Rate \u00d7 Average Loss)
\n Win rate: 54%<\/strong>
\n Average winner: 2R<\/strong>
\n Loss rate: 46%<\/strong>
\n Average loser: 1R<\/strong>
\n 0.54 \u00d7 2 = 1.08
\n 0.46 \u00d7 1 = 0.46
\n Expectancy = +0.62R per trade
\n <\/p>\n

\n What Does +0.62R Expectancy Mean?
\n <\/h3>\n

\n It does not mean every trade earns 0.62R.\n <\/p>\n

\n Individual trades may lose 1R, win 2R or finish near breakeven.\n <\/p>\n


\n Expectancy describes the average edge across many trades \u2014 not the outcome of the next trade.
\n <\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Negative Expectancy
\n <\/h3>\n

If expectancy is consistently negative over a meaningful and properly tested sample, the strategy is losing value on average rather than creating it.
\n <\/p>\n

\n Break-Even Win Rate
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Break-even win rate tells you approximately how often a strategy must win to avoid losing money given a fixed reward-to-risk relationship.\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Reward : Risk<\/th>\nApprox. Break-Even Win Rate<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1 : 1<\/td>\n50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1 : 1.5<\/td>\n40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1 : 2<\/td>\n33.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1 : 3<\/td>\n25%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\n This helps explain why a lower-win-rate strategy can still be profitable when winners are substantially larger than losers.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Statistic #6: Profit Factor
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Profit factor compares the total amount won with the total amount lost.\n <\/p>\n

Profit Factor = Gross Profit \u00f7 Absolute Gross Loss
\n Gross winning trades = 108R<\/strong>
\n Gross losing trades = 46R<\/strong><\/p>\n

Profit factor = 2.35<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Interpreting Profit Factor
\n <\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Profit Factor<\/th>\nGeneral Interpretation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Below 1.0<\/td>\nGross losses exceed gross profits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1.0<\/td>\nApproximately break-even before costs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Above 1.0<\/td>\nGross profits exceed gross losses<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Higher Values<\/td>\nPotentially stronger historical efficiency, but sample size and robustness still matter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Statistic #7: Net R
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Net R adds the result of every trade together.\n <\/p>\n

Net R = Total Winning R \u2212 Total Losing R
\n Total winning R = +108R
\n Total losing R = -46R<\/p>\n

Net result = +62R<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #8: Average R Per Trade
\n <\/h2>\n

Average R Per Trade = Net R \u00f7 Total Trades
\n Net R = 62R
\n Trades = 100<\/p>\n

Average = +0.62R per trade<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n With simple win\/loss outcomes, this should align with the expectancy calculation.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Statistic #9: Maximum Drawdown
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Maximum drawdown measures the largest decline from a previous equity peak to a later trough during the test.\n <\/p>\n

Equity peak: +26R<\/strong>
\n Later trough: +17R<\/strong>
\n Drawdown = -9R
\n <\/p>\n

\n Why Maximum Drawdown Matters
\n <\/h3>\n

\n Two strategies can produce the same total profit but require very different emotional and financial tolerance.\n <\/p>\n

Strategy A<\/strong><\/p>\n

Net: +40R
\n Max drawdown: -6R
\n Strategy B<\/strong><\/p>\n

Net: +40R
\n Max drawdown: -22R<\/p>\n

\n Same historical profit. Very different risk journey.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Drawdown in Percentage Terms
\n <\/h2>\n

\n If your risk is fixed as a percentage of the account, an R-based drawdown can be translated approximately into account risk.\n <\/p>\n

Risk per trade = 0.5%<\/strong>
\n Historical max drawdown = -10R<\/strong><\/p>\n

Approximate simple drawdown = -5%<\/strong> before compounding effects.
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #10: Maximum Losing Streak
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Maximum losing streak measures the largest number of consecutive losing trades in the sample.\n <\/p>\n

L \u00b7 L \u00b7 L \u00b7 L \u00b7 L \u00b7 L \u00b7 W
\n Maximum Losing Streak = 6
\n
\n A strategy can be profitable and still contain uncomfortable losing streaks.
\n <\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Maximum Winning Streak
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Winning streaks matter too because they can influence psychology and create unrealistic expectations.\n <\/p>\n

Maximum historical winning streak: 8 trades<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n Eight consecutive winners do not mean the ninth trade becomes safer.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Statistic #11: Equity Curve
\n <\/h2>\n

\n An equity curve plots cumulative strategy results in chronological order.\n <\/p>\n

0R \u2192 +2R \u2192 +1R \u2192 +3R \u2192 +2R \u2192 +1R \u2192 +3R \u2192 +5R<\/p>\n

\n The shape of the curve can reveal periods of strong performance, stagnation and drawdown.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Do Not Expect a Perfectly Smooth Equity Curve
\n <\/h3>\n

A historical curve that moves upward with almost no meaningful drawdown may deserve extra scrutiny. It can sometimes indicate overfitting, unrealistic assumptions or an unusually favorable sample.
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #12: Recovery Factor
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Recovery factor compares total return with maximum drawdown.\n <\/p>\n

Recovery Factor = Net Profit \u00f7 Maximum Drawdown
\n Net performance = +40R
\n Maximum drawdown = 8R<\/p>\n

Recovery factor = 5.0<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Statistic #13: Trade Frequency
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Trade frequency affects how quickly a strategy can build a meaningful sample and how practical it is for the trader.\n <\/p>\n

Average trades per week
\n Average trades per month
\n Longest period without a setup
\n Average time held per position<\/p>\n

\n A strategy that averages three trades per month may require much more patience than one averaging three trades per day.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Statistic #14: Average Trade Duration
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Duration matters because it affects execution style, overnight exposure and the trader’s lifestyle.\n <\/p>\n

Intraday Strategy<\/strong>
\n Average hold: 40 minutes
\n Swing Strategy<\/strong>
\n Average hold: 2.5 days
\n <\/p>\n

\n Segment the Data
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Overall results can hide important differences.\n <\/p>\n

Performance by market
\n Performance by session
\n Performance by setup type
\n Long vs. short trades
\n Trend vs. range conditions
\n High-volatility vs. low-volatility periods
\n <\/p>\n

\n Example: Same Strategy, Different Sessions
\n <\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Session<\/th>\nTrades<\/th>\nWin Rate<\/th>\nExpectancy<\/th>\nNet R<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
London<\/td>\n70<\/td>\n57%<\/td>\n+0.64R<\/td>\n+44.8R<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
New York<\/td>\n68<\/td>\n43%<\/td>\n+0.11R<\/td>\n+7.5R<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\n Both may be historically profitable, but one session appears substantially stronger.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Example: High Win Rate, Poor Strategy
\n <\/h2>\n

Win rate: 80%<\/strong>
\n Average winner: +0.25R<\/strong>
\n Average loser: -2R<\/strong>
\n Expected win contribution: 0.80 \u00d7 0.25 = 0.20R
\n Expected loss contribution: 0.20 \u00d7 2 = 0.40R
\n Expectancy = -0.20R<\/p>\n

\n The strategy wins often but loses more on average than its winners can recover.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Example: Low Win Rate, Positive Strategy
\n <\/h2>\n

Win rate: 35%<\/strong>
\n Average winner: +3R<\/strong>
\n Average loser: -1R<\/strong>
\n Expected win contribution: 0.35 \u00d7 3 = 1.05R
\n Expected loss contribution: 0.65 \u00d7 1 = 0.65R
\n Expectancy = +0.40R
\n <\/p>\n

\n Strategy Statistics Must Fit the Trader Too
\n <\/h2>\n

\n A mathematically profitable strategy may still be difficult for a particular trader to execute.\n <\/p>\n

Low Win Rate \/ Large Winners<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n Can require tolerating long losing streaks and waiting patiently for larger winners.\n <\/p>\n

Higher Win Rate \/ Smaller Winners<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n May feel psychologically easier but can be vulnerable if occasional losses are too large.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Sample Size Changes How Much You Can Trust the Statistics
\n <\/h2>\n

10 trades with 70% win rate = weak evidence.
\n 100 trades with 57% win rate = more informative.
\n Precision improves as the sample becomes more representative.
\n <\/p>\n

\n Look for Robustness, Not Perfection
\n <\/h2>\n

\n A strategy is more interesting when positive behavior survives across different periods and reasonable variations.\n <\/p>\n

Does it work across multiple months?
\n Does it survive both trend and range conditions?
\n Does one instrument generate all the profit?
\n Does the strategy collapse when realistic costs are included?
\n Does performance remain acceptable on unseen historical data?
\n <\/p>\n

\n Watch for One Trade Carrying the Entire Backtest
\n <\/h2>\n

Net backtest result: +25R<\/strong>
\n One unusually large winner: +18R<\/strong><\/p>\n

Remaining sample: only +7R<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n This does not automatically invalidate the strategy, but it tells you the result may depend heavily on rare outlier trades.\n <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n Track Statistics Over Time
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Do not calculate the numbers once and forget them.\n <\/p>\n

Trades 1\u201350
\n Trades 51\u2013100
\n Trades 101\u2013150
\n Compare whether the core statistics remain reasonably stable.
\n <\/p>\n

\n Example Strategy Statistics Dashboard
\n <\/h2>\n

Strategy Version 1.0
\n Trades<\/strong>
150
\n Win Rate<\/strong>
48%
\n Avg Winner<\/strong>
+2.2R
\n Avg Loser<\/strong>
-1R
\n Expectancy<\/strong>
+0.54R
\n Profit Factor<\/strong>
2.03
\n Max Drawdown<\/strong>
-11R
\n Max Loss Streak<\/strong>
7
\n Net Result<\/strong>
+81R
\n <\/p>\n

\n Questions to Ask Before Calling a Strategy \u201cGood\u201d
\n <\/h2>\n

Is expectancy positive?
\n Is profit factor above 1 after realistic costs?
\n Is the sample large enough?
\n Is maximum drawdown acceptable?
\n Can I psychologically tolerate the losing streaks?
\n Does performance survive different periods?
\n Does one unusual winner dominate the results?
\n Do results remain acceptable on unseen data?
\n Can I realistically execute this strategy live?
\n <\/p>\n

\n Common Strategy-Statistics Mistakes
\n <\/h2>\n

Obsessing Over Win Rate<\/strong>
\n Average winner, average loser and expectancy are ignored.
\n Ignoring Drawdown<\/strong>
\n Total profit looks attractive but the risk journey may be unrealistic.
\n Trusting Tiny Samples<\/strong>
\n Ten or twenty trades are treated as proof of an edge.
\n Ignoring Trade Frequency<\/strong>
\n A strategy may look attractive but produce too few setups to suit the trader.
\n Ignoring Outlier Dependence<\/strong>
\n One huge winner may account for most historical profit.
\n Comparing Strategies Using Only Net Profit<\/strong>
\n Risk, drawdown and consistency are left out of the comparison.
\n Assuming Historical Statistics Are Permanent<\/strong>
\n Real strategy performance can change as market conditions evolve.
\n <\/p>\n

\n Complete Strategy Evaluation Framework
\n <\/h2>\n

1.<\/strong> Confirm sample size.
\n 2.<\/strong> Calculate win rate.
\n 3.<\/strong> Calculate average winner.
\n 4.<\/strong> Calculate average loser.
\n 5.<\/strong> Calculate payoff ratio.
\n 6.<\/strong> Calculate expectancy.
\n 7.<\/strong> Calculate profit factor.
\n 8.<\/strong> Measure net R.
\n 9.<\/strong> Measure maximum drawdown.
\n 10.<\/strong> Measure losing streaks.
\n 11.<\/strong> Review the equity curve.
\n 12.<\/strong> Segment results by market, session and setup.
\n 13.<\/strong> Check whether outliers dominate results.
\n 14.<\/strong> Compare performance across different historical periods.
\n 15.<\/strong> Decide whether the edge, drawdown and psychology fit your trading plan.
\n
\n Trade the Numbers \u2014 Not the Story<\/p>\n

\n Learn How to Measure Whether Your Strategy Actually Has an Edge
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Financial Markets Academy offers live 1-on-1 mentorship for traders who want help building, testing and evaluating complete strategies using real performance statistics instead of relying on isolated wins, screenshots or guesswork.\n <\/p>\n


\n Reserve Your Seat \u2192
\n <\/a>
\n <\/p>\n

\n Strategy Statistics Checklist
\n <\/h2>\n

\u2713 How many trades are in my sample?
\n \u2713 What is the win rate?
\n \u2713 What is the average winner?
\n \u2713 What is the average loser?
\n \u2713 What is the payoff ratio?
\n \u2713 What is the expectancy?
\n \u2713 What is the profit factor?
\n \u2713 What is the net R?
\n \u2713 What is the maximum drawdown?
\n \u2713 What is the maximum losing streak?
\n \u2713 Is one trade responsible for most of the profit?
\n \u2713 Which market and session perform best?
\n \u2713 Can I realistically tolerate and execute these statistics live?
\n <\/p>\n

\n Frequently Asked Questions
\n <\/h2>\n

What is a good win rate in trading?<\/h3>\n

\n There is no universal ideal win rate. A strategy’s win rate must be evaluated together with its average winner, average loser, costs, expectancy and drawdown.\n <\/p>\n

What is trading expectancy?<\/h3>\n

\n Expectancy estimates the average gain or loss per trade based on the probability and size of winning and losing trades across a larger sample.\n <\/p>\n

What does profit factor mean?<\/h3>\n

\n Profit factor compares gross profits with gross losses. A value above 1 means historical gross profits exceeded historical gross losses before considering other limitations.\n <\/p>\n

What is maximum drawdown?<\/h3>\n

\n Maximum drawdown is the largest decline from a previous equity peak to a subsequent trough during the measured period.\n <\/p>\n

Can a 40% win-rate strategy be profitable?<\/h3>\n

\n Yes. If average winners are sufficiently larger than average losers, a strategy can have positive expectancy with a win rate below 50%.\n <\/p>\n

Which trading statistic is most important?<\/h3>\n

\n No single statistic is enough. Expectancy, profit factor, drawdown, sample size, average win\/loss and execution practicality should be evaluated together.\n <\/p>\n


\n Test Yourself<\/p>\n

\n Module 7 \u00b7 Lesson 3 Knowledge Quiz
\n <\/h2>\n

1. Does a higher win rate automatically mean a better strategy?<\/strong>
\n A. No
\n B. Yes
\n C. Only in forex
\n D. Only during New York
\n 2. What does expectancy measure?<\/strong>
\n A. The average expected result per trade over a large sample
\n B. The size of one winning trade
\n C. Only the win rate
\n D. The spread
\n 3. What does a profit factor above 1 indicate historically?<\/strong>
\n A. Gross profits exceeded gross losses
\n B. Every trade won
\n C. Drawdown was zero
\n D. Future profit is guaranteed
\n 4. Why is maximum drawdown important?<\/strong>
\n A. It measures how severe the historical equity decline became
\n B. It guarantees recovery
\n C. It determines the next candle
\n D. It measures only commissions
\n 5. Can a low-win-rate strategy still have positive expectancy?<\/strong>
\n A. Yes, if its average winners are sufficiently large relative to losses
\n B. No
\n C. Only with no stop loss
\n D. Only with leverage
\n Answer Key:<\/strong> 1. A \u00b7 2. A \u00b7 3. A \u00b7 4. A \u00b7 5. A
\n <\/p>\n

\n Key Takeaways
\n <\/h2>\n

\u2713 Win rate should never be evaluated alone.
\n \u2713 Average winner and average loser determine how much each outcome matters.
\n \u2713 Expectancy estimates the average edge per trade.
\n \u2713 A strategy can be profitable with a win rate below 50%.
\n \u2713 A high-win-rate strategy can still have negative expectancy.
\n \u2713 Profit factor compares gross winning results with gross losing results.
\n \u2713 Maximum drawdown reveals the historical pain required to achieve the return.
\n \u2713 Losing streaks should be expected and measured.
\n \u2713 Equity curves should be evaluated for stability, not perfection.
\n \u2713 Segment results by market, session and setup type.
\n \u2713 Watch for strategies that depend heavily on one outlier winner.
\n \u2713 Evaluate the complete statistical profile \u2014 not one attractive number.
\n
\n Coming Next<\/p>\n

\n Lesson 4: Forward Testing & Demo Trading \u2014 Can Your Strategy Survive Real-Time Markets?
\n <\/h2>\n

\n Next, we move beyond historical charts and test the strategy in real time. You\u2019ll learn how forward testing exposes execution problems, missed trades, emotional interference, live spreads and other realities that a historical backtest cannot fully reproduce.\n <\/p>\n

Learn How to Forward Test Your Strategy \u2192
\n
\n Financial Markets Academy provides educational information only. Nothing in this lesson constitutes financial or investment advice or a guarantee of trading performance. Trading leveraged financial markets involves substantial risk and may not be suitable for everyone.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Module 7 \u00b7 Building & Testing a Complete Trading Strategy \u00b7 Lesson 3 Trading Strategy Statistics: Win Rate, Expectancy, Profit Factor &…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":28571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-module-7"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t